The one thing that I feel has been misrepresented the most is the term "IDEAL CUT". There are many companies which claim to have the ideal cut nailed, but in fact there is a range for optimum potential of the diamond's brilliance and beauty. In Modern Jeweler a few months back there was an article which quoted the chairman of the GIA and Lazare Kaplan, when they basically said there was a wide range for maximizing the diamond's potential. If your pocketbook dictates that you need to cut costs
you can do that in the "just outside the ideal range" safely, and well...
Don't let others scare you into thinking otherwise, for that is another
retail trick designed to make it seem they have the keys to knowledge.
You have those yourself folks, unless you choose to give that power
away that is. Here's what constitutes the AGS ideal range for each line
item.
The American Gemological Society has published a list
of standards, and indeed does grade cut by the following criteria...
First, here's the table data, and you'll immediately note there is a
broad range here, which should not suprise you at all, for while some
claim that there is a specific set of data for ideal cuts I can tell
you based on many years of experience, and personal observation that
a wider range exists for a perfectly lovely diamond than most realize.
With a non-AGS cert all you need to remember is a few critical things
to optimize your purchase, and we'll touch on those right now :) More
about that below. A diamond with a 58% table for example should not
be ruled out lightly, for it may well be the most perfect diamond for
your world.
The most common, and most "brilliant", diamond cut is the Brilliant
Cut, a.k.a. the Round Cut, American Ideal Cut, or American Standard
Cut. Back at the turn of the century, Marcel Tolkowsky,
a member of a large and powerful diamond family, calculated the cuts
necessary to create the ideal diamond shape. As part of his PhD thesis
in mathematics, Tolkowsky considered variables such as index of refraction
and covalent bond angles to describe what
has become known as the brilliant cut. This is by far my favorite
cut, having the brilliance and fire that no other cut really approaches.
A large table (over 64%) can really kill the diamond's beauty, and
a stone which it too shallow will also "die optically"... Where a
great place to be is in the 58.5-63% depth and a table size in the
mid fifties, but to about 61.5%, which you can do safely for beauty.
Various cutters have slightly varied definitions of the ideal cut, but if you keep the table size in the mid-fifties and depth between 58-63% you will have a fantastic diamond, and look. I've often said that if the consumer remembers that they have a solid basic understanding to avoid off cuts and poorly cut stone... With certificates and lab reports you are able to completely qualify a diamond you are considering, minus all the sales hype and junk... Don't give the power of understanding away, it will cost you. I wished that GIA gave the more complete dates for diamond in their lab reports, like crown height and pavilion depth, but I'm sure that they will find it necessary to revise their format soon now that AGS is offering a more complete report. The AGS graded diamond are given a "Cut Grade", and makes your life so much easier :) Do not rule out a great well priced diamond on the premise that
some net-bonehead born-again retailer told you that you had to buy
ideal cuts. That is simply not true at all, all diamonds tend to be
a compromise, not everyone wants a "D-Flawless Ideal Cut". I think
that those who try to frighten folks into thinking that only the brand
named"Hearts and Arrows cuts" are worth having does the world a major
disservice. Like Bill Clinton redefining the word "is", some say that
you might get stuck with "Only a Plain Old AGS (000) Ideal cut" if
you don't buy the specific hearts and arrows cut... That is dingo's
kidneys folks... Beauty to me is taking the five C's into harmony, cut, color,
carat, clarity and "cost"... While I really like the table sizes
in the lower to mid fifties I'm a sucker for a high fifties/lower
sixties table on a well cut stone, this is why I coined my 60%/60%
rule, if you just remember that you are well on the way to a massively
brilliant diamond and a very pleasing effect. So, when someone wells
you that there is a magic set of numbers they are quite simply wrong,
for it is indeed a broad range of specs that quality as a beautifully
optimized diamond... |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||